LOL, Turks were not Hittites. In fact, the Hittites collapsed before the Turkish migration to Anatolia. After the Hittite collapse their were neo-Hittite states. These neo-Hittite states were allied with Urartu and had exchanges in populations. Another Hittite kingdom rose called Phrygia (research Hitto-Phrygians). After the Phrygians collapsed most of the population migrated to the Armenian city of Van and assimilated with Armenians (with other small populations assimilating with Kurds and other ethnic groups in the region). And this was all before the 11th century (which is when native Anatolians first set eyes on a Turk). So if you are (theoretically speaking) correct, then that would mean Kurds and Armenians have Turkic blood in them. Which genetic tests prove wrong. Unless you want to question the modern worlds scientists knowledge on genetics. Which I doubt you willÖ.
However, you might just say all the thing I said didnít happen. Which is most likely what you will do. Turks donít have much experience denying the laws of science, but they know their way around when it comes to denying history soÖÖ
Donít get me wrong though, Iím not saying Armenians can take credit for the achievements of the Hittites, which is basically what you try to do. Trying to get us to think every ancient civilization that was advanced and prosperous was Turkic. Doesnít your government already do enough to glorify the Turkish state? Canít you just lay low and not say all this stuff about Aztecs and Egyptians being Turkic?
Or at least long enough to let me catch my breath from all the laughter