QUOTE(Hosank @ 03/31/07 08:36 PM) [snapback]106231[/snapback]
boy am i having fun here.
do you know the mystery of the holy trinity? the FATHER, the son and the holy spirit.
I do not believe in what you say about dogmas .
So i know that Jesus was a b*stard .
i did not say you as a race, i said you as a person..you-mordoth, are a confused little boy who is only trying to fit in to his fascistic little nation.
yes you are a racist. finally you agree with me.
those are not races, but subgroups of the european race of which armenians are also part. btw, french have more frankish(germanic) and celtic blood then latin..they speak a latin language..
and you forgot to say bosnians when you spoke of slavs.
you are not the descendants of attila...attila existed 2 thousand years before turks. though you are somewhat related.
I 'm older than you can guess . I 'm racist , personally .
It is what makes me proud .
French is a mixture , that is true more Jermanic and Celtic , a few latin ; But they defines them as a kingdom built upon the ashes of the Roman Empire . So , i accept is as a Latin country .
Attila was a Pure Turk , the predecessor of GokTurk , the Hunnic language has similarities with Scythians ( SAKA ) and GokTurks . Both of these two ( Scythians and Koktoruks ) are my honor that could not be compound .
European Hunnic state was declined and the nomadic tribes went everywhere .
Pecheneg Turks were one of those settlers that were located in between the green-covered mountains of Bosnia .
the fins are germanic, stop pretending that they are part of you.
and didn't you want us to stop calling you mongols? now you seem to take pride in it.
what is there to believe or not? mordoth..this is as factious as a slap in the face.
educated? hahahahah...sorry, i don't think that goes with the definition of a turk,
which one is aryan? the armenians are.
Fins are TURKIC , and their linguistics are similar with Turkish .
I could say that we ; Hungarians - Fins - Bosniaks - Bulgarians - Turks are cousins . Properly , and indeed .
Bosnians are tried to be assimilated by christian slavs in the west (catholic) and in the south ( orthodox ).
But these 2 could not complete their victory .
We've revived and remember who we were , search for several books , rather than swingling around .
yes you are a racist, but a racist without a cause..because you don't even have a homogenous race to be proud of.
and you are a fascist.
this is the defenition of a fascist Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology accompanied with a mass movement seeking to forge national unity based on ethnic, cultural, or genetic "racial" concepts, and pledging to reclaim historic glory through a struggle to renew and rebuild the society. Various scholars attribute different characteristics to fascism, but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: nationalism, authoritarianism, militarism, corporatism, collectivism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, and opposition to economic and political liberalism.
and that is the philosophy of attaturk, and that is the one followed by your present government. as a supporter of it, you are a fascist, and you know it.
yes they need an autocratic ruler to lead them, because they are too uncivilised to grasp such consepts as democracy, liberty and freedom.
People loved Atatürk ; and his philosophy has never been a fascist rule . During the period of 1925 , Progressivist Party was found . IT was an opponent of RPP ( Republician Peoples Party ).
However , Progressivists disbanded the party because of some anti-revolutionary massive pilements .
Not by an Order of Mustafa Kemal .
A second democratic attempt also occured but lasted as the same , although all of those were established optimistically .
There is no simple PROOF of yours to show me the existence of a Fascist through out the " History of the Turks " .
i know you do.
but, i remember a few topics ago, you argued the exact opposite..
what is going on mordy?
anyways, im glad you came out of the closet.
no more pretending that turkey is civilised, no more pretending that you are democratic, and that you love other races, no more false claims that you believe in freedom and justice.
all you have left, now that you have agreed that you are a bloodthirsty barbarian, is to admit that you are also a genocidal one, and that your grandparents murdered 1.5 million armenians, 500 000 ionian and pontic greeks and ceveral hundred thousand Assyrians between 1915 and 1923. you should also agree that you are not in your land, and that you are on our land.
look at this ancient map.
you will notice that is has greek provinces, such as Ionia, and pontus, lydia, as well as armenia and cilicia (the armenian kingdom of կիլիկիա)..but..where is turkey??http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:15th_ce...rkey_region.jpg
good day to you attaturk.
(btw, today's sources say that attaturk was probably gay)
Are not you a genocidal one ?
Indeed you are . ask your father , how many villagers did he behead during the invasion of Karabagh . It may not be your father who shows an effort physically , but MENTALLY and Morally confirms the humiliation and slaughter .
All races are a little bit barbarian . But let me guess , what you are educated like ;
" Armenians were pink small pixies flying all around the green botanics under sunshine . They 've nothing to do with the rest , but one day some barbaric hordes invaded their lands and cursed the soil. Everywhere turned into cracked yieldless cropless earth burning lavas under it , and the sky was covered by a shade . From that time till now ; the lands have never shined once more . "
Ah , stupid story fetishist armenians .
You show me ancient maps ; FAG ?
The Rules and the Laws are not like these as you refer and prefer to be applied . Such kind of jobs are not proceed with chronological sequence .
If Your race is superior , you 'd kneel .
Love or Die .
Nothing to be spoken more .
BTW ; Atatürk was surely not a homosexual...etc ; I 'm ashamed of speaking such kind of issue ; but Armenians are such a vile race who could speak everything that include insults and humiliations .
In contrary , Atatürk was a vagabond