The sentence in bold was what i wish to hear . Thank you for that .
Sentences which are italic are the same which we are used to hear.
lol, mordoth, if you think you have won anything here, let me explain, for it seems your english is not developed enough to understand this.
if armenians had won back all their lands 1) armenians would have to fight...with weapons..but since we had none of those..there was no fighting..so obviously, we lost.
2) if armenians had won a great military victory over the ottoman empire, there would be no turkish soldier left in wilsonian armenia to perpetrate genocide. so my point is..we are not like turks, who when defeated cry genocide (chechnia, azerbaijan...) but it is the fact that there were no armenian soldiers in the region to protect the victims which allowed genocide to happen.
so it's not a matter of wining or losing, and nationalist feelings being hurt for us to call genocide. and the numbers are not exaggerated.
Azeris did not loose the battle ; Azeris evaluate the battle as Russian-Azeri conflict . Not Armenian-Azeri conflict .
azerbaijan can view it as what ever they want,.., they could say they didn't lose, but went to regroup, they can say it was a first phase, they could say they fought against south africa for all i care. the reality is that 5 times more azeri soldiers died against armenian pesants then armenians died. the reality is that
artsakh is armenian, inhabitated by armenians, and FREE.
Like you informed Switzerland with blackmails .
isn't that what the turkish government did when the swiss imprisoned a greywolf there? and isn't that what turkey did to canada, france, the EU and so on when they accepted it?
and how exactly can the small country of armenia be able to blackmail any of the great and powerful countried of europe?
If your thoughts are BASEFUL ; prove
unless you lost all capacity to process any read material in the past year...i think it was proven mannny times over.
Hittites , Sumerians were all Central Asian tribes and stayed both in M.East and Anatolian region for thousands of years.
yes yes we know, and some guy in the united states called Karesh said he was the reincarnation of jesus, and lead a siege against the US government and making all his supporters commit suicide.
im glad you read mordoth, but don't believe everything that's in a book. i find it funny..everytime you read something about a turk, you see it as the holy bible, and believe it word per word..then you don't give it up. i mean..what i see is that one day, you read that hittites are central asian, and ever since you keep saying that. yet before, you were proud to be a barbaric invader of the 11th century.
and repeating that hittites are your ancestors over and over won't make us believe anything, we arn't graduates from ataturk school here.
Diyarbakir was called " Deiar-i Bekir " which meant " Lands of (Abu)Bakr " . Abu Bakr was the first Caliph .
changing names does not justify your occupation.