90-year-old Letter From A First-hand Witness:, Armenian lies and new evidences! Options

[prot9999]

90-YEAR-OLD LETTER FROM A FIRST-HAND WITNESS:

24 April 2007,

A letter, written by a Swedish commander, who witnessed the events in 1915 and published a newspaper on April 23 1917 has been revealed to read: I never saw Turks conducting a genocide. It is my responsibility to object to these claims. Emigration was a military compulsion for Turks."

Swedish commander: emigration is correct, however genocide did not happen

It has been revealed that a Swedish commander staying in Anatolia as observer refuted Armenian genocide claims in a letter he wrote in 1917. Commander says: "as an eye witness, I object to genocide claims."

It has been detected that a Swedish commander objected to genocide claims that Armenians commemorated each year 90 years ago. Commander Hjalmar Pravitz, who stayed in the Ottoman Empire as an observer, wrote an article for the Swedish Nya Dagligt Allehanda newspaper, dated April 23 1917, stating: "as an eye witness, I certainly object to genocide claims."

Commander Pravitz stated he read the books "Noble Man" by Karl Gustav Ossiannilsson and "The Terrible Situation of the Armenians" by Marika Stjernstedt and pointed out these are all full of lies. The Commander wrote: "all I want to do is relay the events and reveal the distortions in these books."

Source : ERAREN

Everyday we find new evidences about armenian lies. Here are last and will coming more. Where any Armenians evidences, document or withness? Because armenian genocide are big lie.

Armenians! Read above article be carefull! Still Dont mistake peoples! History cannot hide!

History can writing with REALS! not with LIES!

Regards,

[Hosank]

The sentence in bold was what i wish to hear . Thank you for that .
Sentences which are italic are the same which we are used to hear.

lol, mordoth, if you think you have won anything here, let me explain, for it seems your english is not developed enough to understand this.

if armenians had won back all their lands 1) armenians would have to fight...with weapons..but since we had none of those..there was no fighting..so obviously, we lost.

2) if armenians had won a great military victory over the ottoman empire, there would be no turkish soldier left in wilsonian armenia to perpetrate genocide. so my point is..we are not like turks, who when defeated cry genocide (chechnia, azerbaijan...) but it is the fact that there were no armenian soldiers in the region to protect the victims which allowed genocide to happen.
so it's not a matter of wining or losing, and nationalist feelings being hurt for us to call genocide. and the numbers are not exaggerated.

Azeris did not loose the battle ; Azeris evaluate the battle as Russian-Azeri conflict . Not Armenian-Azeri conflict .

azerbaijan can view it as what ever they want,.., they could say they didn't lose, but went to regroup, they can say it was a first phase, they could say they fought against south africa for all i care. the reality is that 5 times more azeri soldiers died against armenian pesants then armenians died. the reality is that
artsakh is armenian, inhabitated by armenians, and FREE.

Like you informed Switzerland with blackmails .

isn't that what the turkish government did when the swiss imprisoned a greywolf there? and isn't that what turkey did to canada, france, the EU and so on when they accepted it?

and how exactly can the small country of armenia be able to blackmail any of the great and powerful countried of europe?

If your thoughts are BASEFUL ; prove

unless you lost all capacity to process any read material in the past year...i think it was proven mannny times over.

Hittites , Sumerians were all Central Asian tribes and stayed both in M.East and Anatolian region for thousands of years.

yes yes we know, and some guy in the united states called Karesh said he was the reincarnation of jesus, and lead a siege against the US government and making all his supporters commit suicide.

im glad you read mordoth, but don't believe everything that's in a book. i find it funny..everytime you read something about a turk, you see it as the holy bible, and believe it word per word..then you don't give it up. i mean..what i see is that one day, you read that hittites are central asian, and ever since you keep saying that. yet before, you were proud to be a barbaric invader of the 11th century.
and repeating that hittites are your ancestors over and over won't make us believe anything, we arn't graduates from ataturk school here.

Diyarbakir was called " Deiar-i Bekir " which meant " Lands of (Abu)Bakr " . Abu Bakr was the first Caliph .

changing names does not justify your occupation.