IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Southern Azeri-Iraqi Turkmen Connection
BIGTURK
post 09/01/05 05:55 AM
Post #1


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 4,688
Joined: 04/17/05 10:54 AM
Member No.: 59



The Southern Azeri-Iraqi Turkmen Connection

David Nissman

The connection, or actual relationship between the southern Azeri Turks, while it has been the subject of both southern Azeri and Iraqi Turkmen literature, has rarely, if ever, been highlighted outside of areas where the two peoples reside. If the southern Azeris and their difficulties with Iran have often been the subject of academic literature, the Iraqi Turkmen have not. The primary question, then, is who are the Iraqi Turkmen?

There are some 3.5 million Iraqi Turkmen in Iraq, generally concentrated in Northern Iraq near the oil-city of Kirkuk. They are the third-largest ethnic minority in Iraq behind the Arabs and Kurds, and just ahead of the Assyrians.

The region (known commonly as Kurdistan) they inhabit has often been the subject of regional geopolitical struggles, primarily between the Ottomans and the Iranians, largely because it was situated at the junction of trade routes leading from the Ottoman Empire and Iran to Baghdad and the Persian Gulf. Long before oil became a significant geopolitical determinant, the area was a zone of conflict, both real and potential.

The Kirkuk region has been the subject of a monograph by Nouri Talabany, "Iraq's Policy of Ethnic Cleansing: Onslaught to Change the National/Demographic Characteristics of the Kirkuk Region" (London, 1999). In the late 19th century, Talabany notes that "one may consider the time of occupation of Kurdistan by the Saffawis during the reign of Shah Ismail as the point in time at which the enforced settlement of Turkmens in the area began. The Saffawid tried to impose the Shi'ite Qizilbashi' faith on the Kurds in an attempt to replace the Sunni Muslims whom they did not trust."

The Turkmen, thus, have been given the role of a microgeopolitical component in regional power struggles. It goes without saying that if Baghdad were able to remove the Turkmen component from the region, they would essentially be removing a future threat, not from the Turkmen, but from those who would protect them. In all this, it is then relevant to ask how the Iraqi Turkmen defines themselves. The first steps toward a self-definition were taken in the earlier efforts of the Iraqi Turkmen to form a modern political organization.

At the First (Iraqi) Turkoman Congress, held in Irbil from 4-7 October 1997, a "Declaration of Principles" was adopted. The second article defines who they are and what the name "Turkoman" represents: "The name Turkoman represents a people belonging to the Muslim Oghuz branch. According to this principle, they migrated from Central Asia to today's Turkmenistan." This migration, according to them, began in the year 53 A.H. Here they are no doubt referring to the immigrations leading to the foundation of the Seljuk empires, which also brought a large part of the ancestors of the present-day Turks of Anatolia, the Caucasus, and Turkmenistan to the regions which they now inhabit. All three Turkic peoples -- the Turks of Turkey and the Balkans, the Azerbaijanis of Azerbaijan and Iran, and the Turkmen of Turkmenistan, Iran, and Afghanistan are members of the Oghuz group of Turkic languages. That means that there is a relatively high degree of mutual linguistic comprehensibility among them.

Article 3 of the "Declaration of Principles" clarifies how the Iraqi Turkoman perceive their linguistic kinship among the Oghuz Turks: "The official written language of the Turkmans is Istanbul Turkish, and its alphabet is the new Latin alphabet." By contrast, in Turkmenistan, the official written language is the Turkmen of Ashgabat, and the alphabet is the modified Cyrillic script imposed on them under the Soviet regime.

When Ashgabat discovered the presence of Turkoman in Iraq in the early 1970s, a Turkmen literary newspaper published a number of Iraqi Turkoman short stories which had to be accompanied by vocabulary lists to aid readers in understanding the language. This is because, as stated in article 3, the Turkic language in Iraq was much closer to that of Istanbul than Turkmenistan. Hence, the ambiguity of the name "Turkoman;" it is, firstly, an English rendition of a Persianified expression; Turkman represents an Arabified term, and "Turkmen" a genuine ethnonym, although it is not ethnolinguistically accurate. The Turkoman of Iraq have been cut off from having a voice in the international community and have thus been unable to define themselves. And that has meant that others have defined who they are rather than they themselves. The convening of the First Iraqi Turkoman Congress was but the first step in reacquiring an international identity; the convening of the February 1999 congress in Irbil was a further step in this direction.

Some questions arise from their definition of themselves: if their officially accepted language, their language of education is Istanbul Turkish, then, in a world without politics (or geopolitics), their language would be Turkish, not Turkmen. Their language is clearly Oghuz but the Turkmen elements in it are vestigial, but there. The key to the solution is buried in their extremely complex history, especially in the period during and after their arrival in Iraq.

According to the noted regional history "Iraq's Policy of Ethnic Cleansing" by Nouri Talabany (London, 1999), the first stratum of the present-day Turkmen arrived during the Omayyad and Abbasid periods, where they were in demand by the rulers because of their prowess in battle. Very little is known about the language(s) they used during this period because there seem to be no surviving traces.

It is commonly believed that the period of a lasting settlement began during the Seljuk period in the 9th to 10th centuries. These Turkmen may indeed have been ethnically similar to the Turkmen of Turkmenistan in Central Asia.

The third stratum can be said to be that which arrived during the Mongol invasions of the regions. These Turks spoke a dialect closely akin to Azeri, something quite perceptible in the language and literature now. Religious differences also help in isolating dialectical elements: Talabany notes that "...Shi'a Turkmens have their own culture and have rituals of their own which differ from those of the Sunni Turkmens. The two sects have different dialects also; the Shi'a Turkmens' dialect is more akin to that of the Azeri Turks."

This strong Azeri influence may explain the close literary relations between the Azeris and the Iraqi Turkmen. At the beginning of 2000 an Iranian Azeri scholar, Qaybali Sakina, published an article in the southern Azeri journal "21 Azar," published by the Sweden-Azerbaijan Federation on "Iraqi Turkmen -- Southern Azeri Literary Relations" in which she highlights the works of the prominent Iraqi Turkmen writer, poet, literary historian, and folklorist Abdullatif Benderoglu. He has translated a number of modern Azeri writers (Northern and Southern) into Turkmen, and has analyzed the origins of Azeri poetry in his book "Azeri Poetry," published in Baghdad in 1989. He also wrote a response to the masterwork of the southern Azeri poet Memmedhuseyn Shahriyar, "Heidar Baba'ya selam." Benderoglu's poem is called "Gur-Gur Baba." Heidar Baba is a mountain dividing north (or independent) Azerbaijan from Iranian Azerbaijan; Gur-Gur Baba is a mountain in Kirkuk, which symbolizes the national aspirations of the Iraqi Turkmen.

Iraq's viewpoint is largely conditioned on two factors: the view of the Ba'th Party, which is promoting the ethnic cleansing effort directed against the Turkmen, and Baghdad's approach to relations with Turkey. In an interview with the London-based Arabic newspaper "Al-Sharq Al-Awsat" of 23 September 2000, Iraq's former Prime Minister Adnan Al-Pachachi referred to talks he held with the Turkish foreign minister in 1966: He said that "three factors have always dictated our relations with Turkey. They are water, the situation of the Kurds, and the situation of the Turkmens in Iraq."

While water is irrelevant to the present topic, the Kurds have achieved a measure of autonomy, which some of the Turkmen share with them, but the Turkish relationship remains strong. Iraqi Turkmen relations with Turkey have not always been strong. When, in 1932 the British gave up their mandate over Iraq, the Iraqi prime minister at the time, Nuri Al-Sa'id, stated in his declaration (issued on 30 May 1932) that Iraqi minorities would receive "full and complete protection of life and liberty, without distinction of birth, nationality, race or religion." In this respect, it has been downhill ever since.

Turkmen were able to lobby successfully for inclusion in the Turkish regional security plan, and then Turkish Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit presented a "revised security plan," updating his original security plan presented in 1995. It stipulated that the Turkmen play a role in a post-Saddam, or new Iraqi government, and that "the world should be reminded of the Turkmen presence in Iraq. Baghdad should be aware of this presence and it should be noted providing certain rights and guarantees to the Turkmens will contribute to ending the division in the country" (quoted by Kemal Balci in the "Turkish Daily News" of 28 January 1999).

Yet, despite the Turkish efforts to help the Turkmen of Iraq, ethnic cleansing continues, education is lamed because the current Iraqi Constitution forbids the use of any script save Arabic (the Turkmen use Latin).

It should be noted that the Turkmen living in Iraqi Kurdistan north of the 36th parallel are not exposed to Baghdad's efforts to destroy their identity. In the south, however, which includes Kirkuk, they are exposed to constant efforts by Baghdad to expropriate their land and property and liquidate their nationality.

The pressures on them are at least as great as those on the Iranian Azeris to conform to the demands of Iranian ethnic, political, and religious pressures. And yet this is not what unites the two peoples: it is that they share the same language and, in part, the same traditions. It is these elements which unite Heidar Baba and Gur-Gur Baba.

http://www.tribun.com/700/779.htm


You notice how this is a Non-Pers, Non-Turk writer from a Non-Iranian/Non-Turk website, I avoid Bias and propoganda in doing so unlike our Persi friend who thinks that Pers Writers and Researchers Soviet method theories are an acceptable source. He's only fooling himself the poor guy icon_wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DÓrÓ
post 09/01/05 06:09 AM
Post #2


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 5,016
Joined: 08/08/05 11:29 AM
Member No.: 147



QUOTE(BIGTURK)


You notice how this is a Non-Pers, Non-Turk writer from a Non-Iranian/Non-Turk website, I avoid Bias and propoganda in doing so unlike our Persi friend who thinks that Pers Writers and Researchers Soviet method theories are an acceptable source. He's only fooling himself the poor guy icon_wink.gif



What are you talking about? YOU USE BIASED SOURCES - ANYTHING THAT SERVES TURAN!

YET YOU FAIL TO REALIZE THAT YOU ARE CONTRADICTING YOURSELF - ON THE MATTER OF KURDISTAN!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BIGTURK
post 09/01/05 06:23 AM
Post #3


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 4,688
Joined: 04/17/05 10:54 AM
Member No.: 59



Diri the man that wrote this is not Turkish or Iranian/Pers this avoids open supportive Bias, I wouldnt expect you to get it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DÓrÓ
post 09/01/05 07:53 AM
Post #4


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 5,016
Joined: 08/08/05 11:29 AM
Member No.: 147



QUOTE(BIGTURK)
Diri the man that wrote this is not Turkish or Iranian/Pers this avoids open supportive Bias, I wouldnt expect you to get it.



IT ISN'T ABOUT "GETTING IT" - IT IS ABOUT YOUR HIPOCRACY... WHAT DO YOU WANT FOR THE KURDS?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BIGTURK
post 09/01/05 11:19 AM
Post #5


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 4,688
Joined: 04/17/05 10:54 AM
Member No.: 59



I want the Kurds to enjoy all their rights and be accepted for who they are and be PROUD, if Kurds win and bravely fight their land in North Iraq and establish a nation this is the mark of a great people, know this land is never GIVEN to people, Turkiye was not Given to us the borders ARE DUG WITH THE BLOOD OF OUR BRAVE SHEHIDS WHO DIED TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE OF THIS LAND, THE HALK SAVED US MEN, WOMAN, THIS IS NATION IS OURS COS WE FOUNDED IT ITS NOT A COLONY GIVEN LIKE IRAQ OR SYRIA OR THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES DRAWN WITH PENS AND RULERS BY THE BRITS AND FRENCH.

North Iraq was promised to Kurds by the Brittish, Ottomans under the Treaty of Sevres had sold out everywhere, we had a REVOLUTION the treaty was made obsolete and the Treaty of Lausanne was made, The Brittish Empire was still intact it didnt keep its promise and created Todays problems, the Villayet of Mosul was to be split between Turkmens and Kurds but to keep the power they didnt allow this. Since then they have tried to use the Kurds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DÓrÓ
post 09/01/05 03:03 PM
Post #6


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 5,016
Joined: 08/08/05 11:29 AM
Member No.: 147



QUOTE(BIGTURK)
I want the Kurds to enjoy all their rights and be accepted for who they are and be PROUD, if Kurds win and bravely fight their land in North Iraq and establish a nation this is the mark of a great people, know this land is never GIVEN to people, Turkiye was not Given to us the borders ARE DUG WITH THE BLOOD OF OUR BRAVE SHEHIDS WHO DIED TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE OF THIS LAND, THE HALK SAVED US MEN, WOMAN, THIS IS NATION IS OURS COS WE FOUNDED IT ITS NOT A COLONY GIVEN LIKE IRAQ OR SYRIA OR THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES DRAWN WITH PENS AND RULERS BY THE BRITS AND FRENCH.

North Iraq was promised to Kurds by the Brittish, Ottomans under the Treaty of Sevres had sold out everywhere, we had a REVOLUTION the treaty was made obsolete and the Treaty of Lausanne was made, The Brittish Empire was still intact it didnt keep its promise and created Todays problems, the Villayet of Mosul was to be split between Turkmens and Kurds but to keep the power they didnt allow this.   Since then they have tried to use the Kurds.



PERSIAN - DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN BY HE IS A TORK E KHAR??? HE NEEDS A GOOD LESSON IN HISTORY! TURKEY LIKE ALL THE MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES IS ARTIFICIAL!

DO YOU NOT ACCEPT THAT KURDISTAN IS THE AREA WHERE KURDS LIVE AND SO CALLED "DOGU" IN YOUR ARTIFICIAL "COUNTRY"?

[size=18][b]DON*T YOU SUPPORT FREEDOM FOR YOUR MULSIM BROTHERS? HYPOCRIT!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BIGTURK
post 09/01/05 03:44 PM
Post #7


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 4,688
Joined: 04/17/05 10:54 AM
Member No.: 59



Diri what is artificial about Turkiye lol, we werent handed this land on a plate by Colonists, we fought the Bravest War recorded in history, imagine being invaded by every super power of the world when you only have the province of ANKARA in your control with no finance, our people our HALK our woman and men led the GREAT TAARUZ and liberated this land with OUR BLOOD FROM INVADING COLONISTS AIMING TO WIPE US OFF THE MAP, this is why we are so proud, what we done has never been mathced the fighting spirit of the TURK always lives on brother, this nations borders are dug with our blood this is no artificial country lol

Dogu province isnt predominantly kurdish lol its predominantly Turkish and Azeri and Cerkez Turk and there are also Kurds. Kurds are predominant in the Iraqi border area of the South East Province, they are predominant in Diyarbekir, Batman, Siirt and parts of Hakkari however, in the provinces of Hatay, SanliUrfa, GaziANTEP, Elazig, Malatya, KahramanMaras, Adana, Adiyaman, Mardin they are not predmoninant there are Arab areas, Turkish, Turkmen, Assyrian/Suryani and in most areas we all live together there are no exlusive race areas know this cano.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 04/16/14 04:07 PM