Donate  Calendar  Members  Search  Help
         
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Bahrain and how it was separated from Iran
Persian
post 09/19/05 12:25 AM
Post #1


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 1,036
Joined: 08/23/05 03:46 PM
Member No.: 155



OKay I don't want to start something here, I'm just posting an article which is interesting to read. here it goes...

Mishmahig Islands (Bahrain), "How was separated from Iran?"

The following summary about Bahrain is based on extracts from the article “Bahrain: the land of political movements”, by Dr. Piruz Mojtahedzadeh, published in Rahavard, a Persian Journal of Iranian Studies, CA, USA VOL.XI, NO.39, 1995.

Dr P. Mojtahedzadeh is a senior research member of Centre for Geopolitics and International Borders studies in University of London, and the Chairman of Board of Directors of the UROSOEC Research Foundation, London.


Mishmahig Island, the present country known as Bahrain is a peninsular located in the southern half of the middle section of the Persian Gulf, which consist of 33 big and small islands. The total areas of these islands are 637 Square Kilometres. Population of Mishmahig is estimated to be half a million. The Shiite population is estimated to be of 75%b of the total, who most of them are from the “Bahaareyneh-gaan”; the decedents of Iranian origin population of the ancient Bahrain.

The Ancient history:
The past civilization of the Bahrain Islands goes back into the depth of history, where “Dilmun culture” thrived two thousands years before Common era.

At the time of second Iranian Empire, the Achaemenids, this land was on the fringe of Iranian territory and when the forth dynasty, the Sasanian Empire was achieving its peak, the encroachment of the Arabs into the Iranian dominion of the southern Persian Gulf started. Shapur I took his forces to Mishmahig and the southern coasts of the Persian Gulf and expelled the alien aggressors.

When Shapour II was only a child, the Arab incursion into the southern coasts of Iranian territory was mounted. As soon as Shapour II grew up, he decided to once and for all cut their hands off Mishmahig and other Iranian territories of the southern coasts of the Persian Gulf forever. To implement such a decision required a hard and unforgettable punishment for the invaders. He sent his army to the region and pushed Arabs out of Iranian territories into the depth of Arabia and restored the security of the Persian Gulf.

What is evident is that the maritime and costal of Bahrain were part of Iranian territory from the beginning of Sasanian Empire until throughout of Iran was occupied by the Arabs Islamic forces and migration of Bedouins from Arabian deserts into southern Iranian territories started.

Buyyid dynasty, freed and reunited much of the country including Mishmahig Islands, after controlling Abbasid caliphs at Baghdad, in Iranian province of Khavarvaran (today known as Iraq), and was part of Iranian realm until 1522 when Portuguese invaded the Island and overthrown the Governor called Jaboor. By In 1602 at the time of soaring power of Safavid dynasty, Iranian forces defeated Portuguese in ports and islands of Hormoz and expelled them from Mishmahig and reunited the islands with the mainland Iran once again.

During this period Mishmahig was administered by the tribes of Iranian origin of “Havaleh” in Zebareh In northern of Qatar Peninsula, when Zebareh was herself under the rule of Government of Fars. Towards the end of Safavid periods though Zebareh Government was ruled namely by Iran, but mostly it was an obstinate and inattentive Government to the centre.

In 1737, when eradication of the local obstinacy was at its apogee, Lotf Ali Khan-e Zand was made in charge by Nader Shah of Afshar dynasty to suppress the rogue ruler of Zebareh. From that time Mishmahig was under the direct rule of Government of Fars and it was the Sheikh Naser Khan, the last Iranian ruler who on behalf of Karim Khan-e Zand the founder of Zandian dynasty would administer the affairs of Zebareh and Mishmahig.

Modern history: The British interference and the implementation of politics of “Depersonalisation of the Persian Gulf”
When Al-Khalifeh of Ban Atebeh of the Arabs entered Zebareh in 1765 political history of Mishmahig and later Bahrain began a new period. It did not take long that he planned to rule Zebareh and Bahrain. Sheikh Naser Khan decided while punishing Bani-havaleh, to put Al Khalifeh in his place. He surrounded Zabaerh but was defeated heavily.

Bahrain in 1783 at the time of ruling of Karim Khan of Zandian dynasty fell into hands of Al Khalifeh and the rule of Iran over these islands was once again stopped.

Al Khalifeh since then was afflicted from encroachment and onslaught from different forces. Vahhabis, Masghatian, Ottoman Turks and finally the English; each one attempted on a few occasions to annex Bahrain to their Dominion.

In 1830 Sheikh Abdul Al Khalifeh declared dependence to the Iranian Government as the Egyptian Mohammad Pasha who took away Arabian Peninsula from Vahhabis on behalf of the Ottoman Empire wanted to know if the people of Bahrain are not in allegiance with Iran, they would ruled by him.

In 1860 the Government of Al Khalifeh repeated the same assertion when the British were trying to overpower Bahrain. Sheikh Mohammad Ben Khalifeh at that time wrote a letter to Nasseredian Shah declaring himself and his brother and all of members of Al Khalifeh and the people of Bahrain to be of Iranian subjects, and in another letter to the Iranian Foreign Minster, Sheikh Mohammad demanded from the Government of Iran to be directly guided and protected in the face of British pressure.

Later on, when the pressure of Colonel Sir Lewis Pelly increased on Al Khalifeh, Sheikh Mohammad requested military assistance from Iran, but the Government of Iran at that time did not had the ability to protect Bahrain from the British aggression. Therefore, the Government of British India eventually overpowered Bahrain and Colonel Pelly in May 1861 signed an agreement with Sheikh Mohammad and later with his brother Sheikh Ali that placed Bahrain under British rule and protection.

When the British forces galloped in Bahrain, they noticed that Sheikh Mohammad ben Khalifeh had hoisted Iranian Flags all over Bahrain’s towers and forts. The British representatives in 1868 signed another agreement with the rulers of Al Khalifeh to the effect Bahrain joined the British protectorate territories in the Persian Gulf. Other agreements of 1880 and 1892 completed ultimately the protectorate status of Bahrain to the British. So Bahrain, which was practically separated from Iran in 1783 but would namely confirm her allegiance to Iran, was practically, namely and officially separated from Iran between the years of 1868 and 1892 for the last time.

The unrest of people of Bahrain in fact began when the Britain colonialism officially established her ultimate and complete dominance over this territory in 1892. The first revolt and widespread uprising took place in the month of March 1895 against Sheikh Essa Ben Ali the then ruler of Al Khalifeh. Sheikh Essa was the first ruler of Al Khalifeh who was ruling on that land without any relations with Iran. SIR Arnold Wilson, the political representative of Britain in The Persian Gulf (the writer of book” The Persian Gulf”), arrived in Bahrain from Masghat at this time. The extent of this uprising developed further and some of the protesters were killed by the British forces.

In 1911 a group of merchants of Bahrain, demanded the restriction of the British influence in Bahrain. The leaders of this movement were arrested and exiled to India. In 1923 the British deposed Sheikh Issa Ben Ali with accused of opposing Britain and set up a permanent representative in Bahrain. This coincided with renewal of Iran` claim over the ownership of Bahrain and Sheikh Essa had been accused of welcoming this development. Also the attachment shown by the People of Bahrain towards the renewal of ownership’s claim by Iran caused concern for Britain. To remedy these problems, Britain dispatched one of the most experienced colonial officers, Sir Charles Belgrave as an advisor to the Emir of Bahrain in 1926. His harsh measures caused to intensify the increasing aversion of people towards him and resulted eventually in his expulsion from Bahrain in 1957. Belgrave’s colonial undertakings were not limited to the violent deeds against the people of Bahrain but a series of dastardly initiatives, which included deiranisation of Bahrain and The Persian Gulf, and the he proposal to change the name of Persian Gulf in 1937 which did not take place but carried out by Abdul Karim Ghasim, the dictator of Baghdad.

In 1927 Reza Shah in a letter to the Allied Nations Community demanded the return of Bahrain. Britain knew well that her weakened domination over Bahrain would be equal to loose control all over the Persian Gulf, decided to bring under control at any cost the uprisings of people of Bahrain. To achieve this the British elements encouraged conflicts between Shiite and Sunni in Bahrain.

The Iranian tendency in the uprising of this period was to such an extent that forced the Members of Parliament of Iran to pass a bill in the November of 1957, to the effect to announce Bahrain as the Fourteenth province of Iran, and two empty seats were considered for the representatives of this province. This action was detrimental for Iran as it caused numerous problems in the international relations, specially with some United Nations bodies, Britain, Saudi Arabia, and numbers of Arab countries and provided a big excuse for Iraqi extremist to extent anti Iranian campaign in the region. This action was against the people of Bahrain as not only caused an increase sense of precaution of Britain and the Government of Bahrain towards the Iranian connection of Bahrain’s people uprisings, but forced the freedom loving people of Bahrain from expressing any Iranian tendency in order to avoid accusation o f dependency to “the expansionist policies of Iran in the Persian Gulf”, which at time was being propagated intensely against her deserving rights in the Persian Gulf.

At this time, Britain carried out the dastardly cogitation to change the demographic face of Bahrain. This policy of “Deiranisation” in Bahrain consisted of importing a large number of different Arabs and others from British colonies as labourers into Bahrain. At the same time it is noteworthy that the demonstrations of year 1956 forced the rulers of Al Khalifeh to leave Manama (The capital of modern Bahrain) and reside in the village of Refae Al Gharbi and only Sunni Arab servitors as their bodyguards were allowed to live in that village.

However the Government of Al Khalifeh is considered a flexible and liberal Government to compare to all the Arab Governments of the Persian Gulf, especially in comparison to the Governments of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and to the dictatorship of Iraq. The reason for this flexibility should be looked into the following two nokteh: Firstly, the Arabs of Al Khalifeh (Bani Atub) found themselves from the beginning of their arrival among Iranians and could never do away with this notion of “Unwanted guests”, secondly the synthesis of population of Bahrain has been and is different the region Emirates.

While the other Emirates have been tribal communities, which have grown around the dominating tribe, Bahrain has been an urban society from the ancient times like the societies of Iran and Mesopotamia. For this reason the rulers of Bahrain have not been able to deprive every members of society from taking part in the affairs of the country.

In 1965, Iran began dialogues with Britain in anticipation to determine her borders in the Persian Gulf. It was not long enough that the endurance of these talks became impossible as both parties realised with the existing extensive differences over borders and territory in the region; including the dispute relating to the dominion of Bahrain, the determination of maritime borders between the northern and southern countries of the Persian Gulf is not feasible.

At the same time Malek Faisal, the King of Saudi Arabia arrived in Iran, which included the creation of Islamic Conference; and the decision to determine the maritime borders of the two countries. In return, it was agreed that Shah of Iran would visit Saudi Arabia in 1967. A week before this visit, the Saudis received Sheikh Essa Ben Salman Al Khalifeh, the Emir of Bahrain as a head of state in Riyadh. This caused the cancellation of Shah's visit and the relation between the two countries tarnished severely. The mediation by Sultan Hasan, the king of Morocco repatriated the relationship between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Eventually Iran and Britain agreed that the matter of Dominion of Bahrain to put to international judgment and requested the United Nations General Secretary to take on this responsibility.

It was a Plebiscite and not a Referendum!
Iran was trying hard so that the destiny of Bahrain would be determined through a referendum. Britain was sternly opposed to this and the Government of Bahrain was not in any way prepared to accept such a referendum. The reason for opposing was that the Government of Al Khalifeh saw the legal concept of holding such a referendum would be to negate the 150 years of his rule in Bahrain. Finally Iran and Britain agreed to instead of holding Referendum, to request United Nations through conducting a Plebiscite (Nazar khaahi e oumoumi; opinion poll) in Bahrain, to determine the political future of that territory. Outant The then General Secretary of the United Nations, in reply to the letters of Iran and Britain in the month declared in the month of March 1970, his readiness to fulfil this mission and Sinior Vittorio Winspere Guicciardi the Manager of The United Nation office in Geneva was put in charge to execute the task. Guicciardi and his colleagues entered in Bahrain and began the task of conducting the Plebiscite on 30 March 1970. This mission continued more than two weeks and during this period Guicciardi conducted meetings with the leaders of different groups and classes of people of Bahrain and finally surrounded his report no. 9772 to the General Secretary of the United Nations. Clause 57 of this report indicates: (the result of investigation has convinced me that the absolute majority of people of Bahrain demand that their territory to be officially recognised as an independent country with complete soverngnity and freedom of choosing relations with other nations.)

The report of Guicciardi was surrounded to the Security Council of the United Nations and in the meeting of 11th May 1970 was discussed. Following the ratification of this report, the mentioned resolution of Security Council was conveyed to the Governments of Iran and Britain. The Governments of Iran reported the result of the mission and the resolution of the United Nations to the two assemblies (The lower and upper houses of Parliaments). The report of The Government was ratified by Iranian National Assembly (Mjles-e Shoray-e Melli) in 14th of May, and by Iranian Senate (Majles-e Sena) on 18th of May.


*** Note: This article is originated from CAIS at SOAS (http://www.cais-soas.com); copyright © CAIS at SOAS.
http://www.iranchamber.com/geography/artic...nds_bahrain.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dîrî
post 09/19/05 09:35 AM
Post #2


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 5,016
Joined: 08/08/05 11:29 AM
Member No.: 147



Why does it say that Shapur wanted Bahrain under IRANIAN control?


You DO know that the SASANIAN dynasty were KURDISH Kings? icon_biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Persian Gulf_*
post 10/04/05 11:43 PM
Post #3





Guests






QUOTE(Dîrî)
Why does it say that Shapur wanted Bahrain under IRANIAN control?


You DO know that the SASANIAN dynasty were KURDISH Kings? icon_biggrin.gif



Diri you have now stretched your feet out of the blanket

now you dare to relate the Sasanian Empire with a clan.

Somebody better give you a crash course in ancient history.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dîrî
post 10/05/05 08:24 AM
Post #4


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 5,016
Joined: 08/08/05 11:29 AM
Member No.: 147



QUOTE(Persian Gulf)
QUOTE(Dîrî)
Why does it say that Shapur wanted Bahrain under IRANIAN control?


You DO know that the SASANIAN dynasty were KURDISH Kings? icon_biggrin.gif



Diri you have now stretched your feet out of the blanket

now you dare to relate the Sasanian Empire with a clan.

Somebody better give you a crash course in ancient history.



What now? Are you gonna deny Kurdish part in "Iranian" history? The Sasanian dynasty were KURDS... What do YOU base your claim on? I guess my claim is stronger than yours... I have a father who has a proffessor degree on Iranian litterature from the Shah era in Iran... What have you got? icon_confused.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nesreen
post 11/20/05 04:27 PM
Post #5


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 2,977
Joined: 03/22/05 04:12 PM
Member No.: 20



QUOTE(Persian)

Modern history: The British interference and the implementation of politics of “Depersonalisation of the Persian Gulf”


Interesting . I did not know all those facts . Yes i have no problem believing the interference , that how they created Lebanon out of syria and Koweit out of Iraq . and made Kurdistan disappear .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kardox
post 01/11/06 04:52 AM
Post #6


Poster
**

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 76
Joined: 01/09/06 06:48 PM
Member No.: 321



The mother is Darius was a mede, as we all know there are strong indications that Medes are Kurd’s ancestors. The Safavides were turks and the Qajars were Turks too, and even the Pahlavies were Turks. Many of the so-called Persian empires rulers were non-Persians, so why are u denying the Kurdish-ness of the Sassanies,? Sassanies spoke Pahlavi, the Kurdish dialects of Karmashani_(kermonshahi) are pahlavi too. Sassani kings were based in kermashan region thats an other indication to their kurdish-ness.I wish they weren’t kurds, because they lost the war to the tazis, but their Kurdish-ness is a fact.Btw, do u also deny the Kurdish-ness of the most just dynasty of the history the Kurdish Zands?



QUOTE(Persian Gulf)
QUOTE(Dîrî)
Why does it say that Shapur wanted Bahrain under IRANIAN control?


You DO know that the SASANIAN dynasty were KURDISH Kings? icon_biggrin.gif



Diri you have now stretched your feet out of the blanket

now you dare to relate the Sasanian Empire with a clan.

Somebody better give you a crash course in ancient history.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dîrî
post 01/11/06 08:20 AM
Post #7


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 5,016
Joined: 08/08/05 11:29 AM
Member No.: 147



QUOTE(kardox)
The mother is Darius was a mede, as we all know there are strong indications that Medes are Kurd’s ancestors. The Safavides were turks and the Qajars were Turks too, and even the Pahlavies were Turks. Many of the so-called Persian empires rulers were non-Persians, so why are u denying the Kurdish-ness of the Sassanies,? Sassanies spoke Pahlavi, the Kurdish dialects of Karmashani_(kermonshahi) are pahlavi too. Sassani kings were based in kermashan region thats an other indication to their kurdish-ness.I wish they weren’t kurds, because they lost the war to the tazis, but their Kurdish-ness is a fact.Btw, do u also deny the Kurdish-ness of the most just dynasty of the history the Kurdish Zands?



QUOTE(Persian Gulf)
QUOTE(Dîrî)
Why does it say that Shapur wanted Bahrain under IRANIAN control?


You DO know that the SASANIAN dynasty were KURDISH Kings? icon_biggrin.gif



Diri you have now stretched your feet out of the blanket

now you dare to relate the Sasanian Empire with a clan.

Somebody better give you a crash course in ancient history.


Don't worry brother... I know the answer already! (And I am not even psychic, or? icon_eek.gif )

I am sure the answer is:

"Are jooooonam" or in English - "Yes daaaaaaarling"... icon_lol.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BIGTURK
post 01/11/06 09:05 AM
Post #8


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 4,688
Joined: 04/17/05 10:54 AM
Member No.: 59



QUOTE
karadox
The mother is Darius was a mede, as we all know there are strong indications that Medes are Kurd’s ancestors. The Safavides were turks and the Qajars were Turks too, and even the Pahlavies were Turks.


Exactly man, except for the Shah Pahlavi, he was a puppet of the Brittish, this means the only time Persians have ruled in thousands of years is only when the Brittish installed them.

QUOTE
Diri
What now? Are you gonna deny Kurdish part in \"Iranian\" history? The Sasanian dynasty were KURDS...


Is this common for Persians to do Diri? I dont get it at all, they talk about the pride of being an Iranian and that were all Iranian but want to deny any mention of Kurd and Turk history, inluence, culture and identity in Iran, I mean this is Iranian aswell according to their view. However, its like you commit a huge crime if you mention anythinh Non-Persian so this theory of Iranianism is ridiculous. Even worse, they try to pretend that everything was Persian, Sassanians, Zands, Selcuks, Gaznivids, Qajars etc etc icon_rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dîrî
post 01/11/06 09:16 AM
Post #9


Member
*******

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 5,016
Joined: 08/08/05 11:29 AM
Member No.: 147



Common?

In Iran - children at school learn that everything they learn is Iranian - oopps - sorry - I meant PERSIAN...

They teach them the Persian language, Persian history, Persian culture and Persian animals and Persian geography and Persian EVERYTHING... It makes me wanna vomit!

And when they speak of what is actually Kurdish - they call it "Old Persian" - and when they speak of something Turkish they call it "Mongol" - instead of the real name - Turkish...

They live in denial... Much like Turkey does about it's Kurds...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaff Sassani
post 11/22/07 09:07 AM
Post #10


Poster 200
****

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 284
Joined: 11/21/07 10:15 AM
Member No.: 3,513
Conflict/Cultural/Country Interest: Plight of Sassanian people in Kurdistan region of Iraq and Iran



United (Aryan Union)
The word above is very important word, it is the source of success, and then many questions will hunt us always as the Aryan people in the Middle East why we don’t have unity, what happen to us, we are so divided and hopeless and doesn’t have any hope we will be united again.
As we know the word united will be for two person and more, so one person need to get along with other person to form united, like marriage between man and women or two person starting business and so on.
The question will come up again and again to have successful marriage both man and women must love each other and be honest with each other, sharing the pain and happiness of existence then they will produce the good family, when adding up all the families we will have a good and stable society. To have successful business the partner must be honest with each other if one cheat on the other the business will fail for sure.

We Aryan people in the Middle East (Kurd, Persian, Azeri, Afghani, Tajik and other Aryan nations) have hard time to get united. Let examine our past in hope we will be able to see our problem today. Once we did have strong and independent country under the Sassanian Empire seems all the Aryan people felt belong to that Empire that was the source of the strength and independent as one nation under the Sun.

The question will come up is the holly sprit beloved son of the Aryan people Ardashīr-i Pāpagān was a magician, a trader, a thief, a liar, you name it or he was honest with his people so how he was able to unite all this people. We know that honesty, integrity, face full to your people will bring unity, then he was indeed had all of the above to be able to unit the Aryan people.

When Arab nationalist hijacked Islamic Religion and formed their own united front to attack our homeland, we must been divided people at that time that is why we lost our independent and become slave of the Arab to this day, let bow our head to the great sprit of the Ardashīr-i Pāpagān and other great leaders of the Aryan people and promise that we will study our past and get united in word and action to gain back our dignity among other nations in the world.

In the old day there was many nation on the earth like Japanese, Chinese, Europeans, Aryans (Iranian) and others. All the nations above went up and down in the history but they regained their own independent today except Aryan peoples. The Chinese people almost wiped out by Jenghiz Khan of Mongolia, Western nations and Japanese, The Japanese was occupied by America, the Europeans was concurred by Mongolian, Huns Turk, Ottoman Turk, the Aryan Empire (Sassanian Empire) was concurred by Arab and later by Mongolian.

Today all the nations above gain back their own place on the earth under the Sun except our Aryan people without hope to get united again because we are so divided just like those days when Arab Army attacked us and destroyed our homeland. For us to have united country we need to get united first. How we get united? The answer we need to study our past carefully so we know who we are then looking for answer.
We are newly formed organization to start looking at our past in hope getting educated about our self; we understand for Sure that Islamic Religion was hijacked by Arab Nationalist and used to occupy other people countries and they are doing very well. Today they are controlling one billion people as hostage to their ideas in every Islamic countries around the world they have cadres and agent injected to every level of the Islamic society, for example the religion families called Sayed one way or another they are controlling the non Arab Moslem society by claming that they are the children of the Prophet Mohammad this phenomenon does not exist in the Arab world.

The Sayed calling them self-children of the Prophet Mohammad and they are claming to be of the Arab origin, they are controlling the day-by-day religion affair in the Islamic world except the Arab countries. As you can see the unity of Aryan people will be impossible when Arab people controlling the important part of the society the uneducated ones.

The Islam saying there are no different between Moslems or in other words Islam saying there are no different between Arab and Ajam (Aryan people) except in the amount of praying, so how we have such a powerful Sayed families controlling our life, please look at the origin of the ruler of Iran today and judge your self.

In conclusion we are never get united unless we understand our past and our present condition, to get united we have to be honest and believe on serving our nation face fully, when we are trader, thief and liar toward each other and our nations then will be impossible to get united. Let remember our past and work hard to form the Aryan Union (AU) similar to the European Union (EU). Let get ourselves out of the control of Sayed, by understanding Islam we don’t need their guidance we all educated people now why we need Black turban or green turban to teach us Islam, let be like Arab world not bowing to religion peoples at all let bow only to God the creator of all you see and not able to see.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaff Sassani
post 11/22/07 12:11 PM
Post #11


Poster 200
****

Group: MEIC Conversion Group
Posts: 284
Joined: 11/21/07 10:15 AM
Member No.: 3,513
Conflict/Cultural/Country Interest: Plight of Sassanian people in Kurdistan region of Iraq and Iran



Glory, Glory the Aryan Union (AU) will be here just like European Union (EU) United (Aryan Union)

The Japanese people does not have atomic bomb yet they are the most powerful nation on earth today, even they were under United State occupation. So why the Islamic republic of Iran want to build the atomic bomb, they claming to get the Islam independent without taking order from USA or European Union but smarty Russian did have a lot of atomic bombs without to much accomplishment for their people.

Please read the cote by former President of the United State of America Mr. Bill Clinton when he said, “It is economy Stupid”.


Ērānšahr[58] [58]
Sassanid Empire



The Aryan, Eransahr (Iranian) need healthy economy not Atomic Bombs, the people starving under the Arab ruler of Iran (Sayedi Arabi the children of the Prophet Mohammad from his daughter Fatima wife of Ali Bin Abo-Talib).

Why people of Iran blind the ruler in Iran all Sayedi Arabi except Ayatullah Ali Akbar Hashmi Rafsanjani who is Mongol origin, so why you are blind when you going to understand, look they are trying to liberate Palestine, ask your self what is the benefit of that fight for Iran and Iranian people.

Arab under Islamic pretext destroyed our culture, our independent, our economy, our life when you will get the picture.

Wake up build your economic Union to liberate your people from poverty, disease, hunger, million of other problems, rebuild your union, your independent, get your dignity back among other nation in the world.

The western country and United State of America are not your enemy, it is you don’t blame others for your problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 


Middle East Information Center © 2005